Ethereum: If SegWit only increases the capacity to only 2-4x only. Wouldn’t we have the same issue in a few years again?

Ethereum segregated witness (segwit) and its potential effect on scalability

One of the most significant concerns about the scaling of Ethereum was the full 1 MB block size restriction required by updating the Bitcoin Protocol Segwit. But how does this affect the scalability? In this article, we are immersed in the consequences of Segwit and that increasing capacity can lead to a similar issue in the future.

What is Segwit?

A segregated witness (Segwit) is an easy alternative to Bitcoin’s block size (BSI). It is designed to improve the bitcoin block creation rate without requireing a hard fork. By reducing the size limit of the block, Segwit aims to increase the number of transactions that fit into each block, thereby increasing the transaction capacity.

What does segwit do?

Segwit achieves this by introducing a new type of data structure, the so-called segregated witness (SW-Data). This allows compact and more efficient storage of data within the blocks. The SW-Data structure consists of four fields: the header, the index, the sequence and the useful burden.

How does it work?

Here’s a simplified example of Segwit’s operation:

  • The sender creates a transaction with a useful load (data to be stored).

  • The useful load is encrypted using ECDSA.

  • The header contains metadata such as the public address of the sender, the recipient’s public address and the useful burden.

  • Index and sequence fields are used for indexing purposes.

  • The useful burden is compressed by the lossless compression algorithm itself (such as Snappy).

  • The compressed useful load is stored in the block.

Increased capacity: 2-4x

When the Segwit was first executed, the efficiency of the growing capacity was limited due to the technical constraints. However, later updates refined and optimized the SW-Data structure, allowing better performance without sacrificing the ability. It is estimated that increasing the segwit block size limit may increase capacity by 2-4x.

Potential Question: A similar scalability problem in the future

Ethereum: If SegWit only increases the capacity to only 2-4x only. Wouldn't we have the same issue in a few years again?

If the size limit of the total 1 MB block rises again, it is possible that similar dimensioning problems may arise. The underlying architecture and data structures must be modified to accommodate larger blocks that can be complex and costly.

The most important concern is that increasing the size limit of the block can lead to the following:

  • Increased computational energy demand for miners

  • Higher Electricity Consumption Due to Increased Network Activity

  • Safety has declined as multiple transactions are processed in a single block

  • Potential problems with the integrity and storage capacity of data

In summary, although Segwit has taken significant steps to improve scalability without a hard fork, increasing capacity in the future can cause similar scalability problems. It is essential that Ethereum developers continue to refine and optimize the SW-Data structure to deal with these concerns.

Conclusion

Updating Ethereum Segwit is an important step in improving the scalability, but its efficiency was restricted by technical barriers. Although increasing the size limit of the block may improve capacity, it is crucial to take into account the future scalability issues that arise. As the blockchain region develops further, developers and stakeholders are essential to work together to ensure Ethereum’s long-term health and sustainability.

custodial layer scaling


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *