Ethereum: What block space savings would we get for coinjoins (and payjoins) if we had cross input signature aggregation?

I will provide you with an article on Ethereum Block Space Saving and Cross-Input Signature Aggregation. If you want me to continue, please let me know.

Title: Ethereum: Cross-Input Signature Aggregation and Block Space Saving for Coin Merging (Speculative Future Soft Fork)

Introduction

The Ethereum network is known for its complex consensus algorithm, which involves a multi-layered proof-of-work (PoW) mining process. While this system provides security and scalability benefits, it also has limitations in terms of block space consumption. Cross-input signature aggregation (CISA) is one possible solution that aims to reduce the computational requirements of Ethereum’s PoW-based consensus algorithm.

What is cross-input signature aggregation?

Cross-input signature aggregation is a technique that involves aggregating signatures from multiple input blocks to create a single, combined signature. This process is designed to reduce the computational complexity required for proof of work, thereby reducing block space savings and energy consumption.

Benefits of CISA on Ethereum

Ethereum: What block space savings would we get for coinjoins (and payjoins) if we had cross input signature aggregation?

CISA has several potential benefits on Ethereum, including:

  • Reduced Energy Consumption: By aggregating signatures from multiple input blocks, CISA reduces the number of computations required to verify a transaction.
  • Increased Scalability: Reduced computational complexity can lead to faster block times and increased network throughput.
  • Improved Security: CISA can help reduce the risk of vulnerabilities in smart contracts by reducing the attack surface.

Weight Units vs. VBytes

Both weight units (WU) and vBytes must be considered to calculate potential block space savings. Weight units are a measure of the computational complexity required for Ethereum’s PoW-based consensus algorithm, while vBytes represent the number of bytes used in the aggregated signature.

Assuming an average weight unit of 2^16 bytes (1 KB), CISA can potentially reduce block space savings by up to 50% on average. This is because CISA aggregates signatures from multiple input blocks, which reduces the computational complexity required for verification.

Speculative Future Soft Fork

To further explore the potential benefits of CISA and its impact on Ethereum’s block space savings, we can consider a speculative future soft fork scenario. In this scenario, CISA is implemented as part of the next major upgrade (EIP-1559).

If CISA is implemented, Ethereum’s PoW-based consensus algorithm could be replaced by a proof-of-stake (PoS) system or a hybrid approach that combines elements of both algorithms. This would allow for increased scalability and security benefits while reducing energy consumption.

Conclusion

Cross-input signature aggregation can reduce block space savings on Ethereum by up to 50% on average, as it is able to aggregate signatures from multiple input blocks. While this is only a speculative scenario for a future soft fork, it highlights the importance of exploring alternative consensus algorithms that can improve scalability and security.

Recommendations

To maximize the benefits of CISA, we should consider the following recommendations:

  • Implement CISA on Ethereum

    : Consider implementing CISA as part of the next major upgrade (EIP-1559) to achieve significant block space savings.

  • Hybrid PoS approach: Explore a hybrid approach that combines elements of both algorithms to further reduce energy consumption and increase scalability.

By exploring alternative consensus algorithms such as CISA, we can work towards a more scalable, secure, and efficient Ethereum network in the future.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *